
OSA / Guide / RIP / 1956 / RFE/RL Background Reports : Subjects | Browse | Search
The text below might contain errors as it was reproduced by OCR software from the digitized originals,
also available as Scanned original in PDF.BOX-FOLDER-REPORT: 30-3-174 TITLE: The Hungarian Cultural Journal "Kortars" - A Review of its February Number BY: DATE: 1958-3-13 COUNTRY: Hungary ORIGINAL SUBJECT: Hungarian Research THEMATIC SUBJECTS: Hungary--1956-1965, Hungary--Literature, Cultural Policy --- Begin --- "E" DISTRIBUTION - 290 13 MARCH 1958 RFE NEWS & INFORMATION SERVICE - EVALUATION AND RESEARCH SECTION Background Report (Hungarian Research) THE HUNGARIAN CULTURAL JOURNAL "KORTARS"-- A REVIEW OP ITS FEBRUARY NUMBER* The periodical "Kortars" is one of the accurate reflections of contemporary Hungarian literature. The paper was first published in September 1957 as a literary and critical monthly. At the time the government was trying to find the path of peace with the writers and used conciliatory tones. From the literary and critical articles published in "Kortars" a certain degree of freedom and independence could undoubtedly be ascertained, in spite of occasional assertions of official government policy. "Kortars" does not belong to any of the political organs. Its editors are: Jozsef DARVAS and Gabor TOLNAI. The following is a summary of its February number. The contributors are rather mixed: most of them are politically undistinguished and the articles are mostly non-political. The better-known contributors are: Laszlo NEMETH: an excerpt from his dramatical work "Samson". Sandor WEORES:. surrealist poems. Geza FEJA: "The Enigma of Gyula JU1IASZ" an essay. Populist writer Andras FODOR: some poem. Populist writer Jozsef ERDELYI: a poem. Professor Jozsef WALDAPFEL: essay on Gorky and Madach. Other items included: An essay on Petru GROZA by Bela KOPECZI, employee of the chief directorate of a ministry; two poems "by Jozsef NADASS, old * This paper is a supplement to Hungarian Research Background Report of March 7 "The Situation of the Hungarian Writers after the Revolution" (from July 1957). [Page 2] BACKGROUND REPORT No. 290, Social Democrat poet; poems by a number of authors less significant politically; Memorial on Andor Gabor, by Andras DIOSZEGI; Poems by Sandor RAKOS, Andras SIMOR, Otto DEMENY, Zoltan CSUKA, Lajos SIMON, Janos NEMETH, Eela CSEPELI SZABO, Margit SZECSI, Gyula SIPOS and LAJOS FEKETE. In the theatrical column, Imre DEMETER, an old sympathizer of Imre NAGY, reports on the theatrical events of the season. There is an essay on Francoise SAGAN by Bela ABODI, hook reviews by Lajos MESTERHAZI, Pal PANDI, Janos KELEMEN and others. The two most interesting articles, essays on literary criticism, were written by Miklos SZABOLCSI and Gyorgy BESSENYEI. "The face of a Generation" Article. Miklos SZABOLCSI "The Face of a Generation?" covered an anthology of poems by 15 young poets. This anthology was published in 1957 and comprised 105 poems by 15 young poets, edited by Istvan SIMON. SZABOLCSI compares this volume with a similar publication in 1952. The first anthology was characterized by an enthusiasm ringing true at the time, for Party, the people, the building of socialism, but also by many cliches, much schematism and many empty phrases... There is nothing similar in this new volume. There is no schematism, no enthusiasm and no formalistic stumbling. On the contrary! According to SZABOICSI, the poems of this anthology are characterised by formalistic routine, a uniformly high standard,, daring imagery, richness of rhythm and poetical forms, a certain chiseled smoothness and in general an evenly high level of poetical culture. SZABOLCSI seems to recognise in the work of the young poets the influence of Attila Jozsef, Gyula ILLYSS and to a lesser degree that of Babits, Arpad Toth Kosztolanyi and Sandor WEORES. The most interesting assertion is that the young poets are characterized by a disinterest in politics. [Page 3] BACKGROUND REPORT No.290, How moving is this struggle of the young: for themselves, for their place in the world, their wish for a beautiful life, for a world of true humanity; how dearly they attempt to see things in the chaos of the past years, and how they guard their ideals in spite of occasional deviations. According to SZABOLCSI, the poems reflect the strain of our years This worries him. Each one of these young poets started out on his path in the years when democracy and its achievements are natural conditions to them, unnecessary to be discussed. They speak rather of other things: of the basic disturbing impressions of their homelessness. These hide behind their chiseled forms, suggested in the images they describe, impregnating their subjects. SZABOLCSI tries to explain the reason. Values were shattered in them and new ones not yet created; disillusionment and uncertainty, bitterness, reaching the point of opposition and sadness took hold of them. Apart from "dogmatical constraint and distortions** the obstacles of the development of this generation are: The breakdown and deformation of our development, its fault: and its extremes. Everyone of us has been subjected to manifold and complex influences and this mainly applies to the sensitive young intellectuals; the tumbling down of ideals, parents' complaints, financial and personal worries. All these factors were strengthened by the direct or indirect influence of petty bourgeois ideology, that of literary. circles, sometimes in the form of a healthy initiative but sometimes also in the form of snobism by the unsatisfactory guidance of Communist literature the constant alternatives of either rigidity or liberalism. All these had a destructive effect on youth and drove them into despair or mostly into withdrawal. This retrospection, this lack of revealing themselves, characterize our generation of the young writers. [Page 4] BACKGROUND REPORT No.290, Reserve instead of revealing themselves, the cult of life's drabness and not its colorful aspects, obstinate stiltedness and not the free flow of words are characteristic. The poets have withdrawn into private life but In poems about loves grief, awkardness and escape are the dominating features. Life, external realism -- however much they influence the young and however much they try to get a hold on them -- very often appear in the poems conventionalized, apologetically and as seen trough the dense filter of literary and fashionable drifts... The young poets look back at the thirties: they try to get into contact with the Hungarian and Western European poetry of that time. From the lyrical poetry of the thirties they have not only taken over the tone but the ideology and the subjects as well, as if the attitude of 1935 could also be continued in 1955 in point of time, ideology and subject. There must be no misunderstanding. I have no longing for the direct, political poetry, the schematism of 1955, nor do I miss the instant reaction to any political events but I certainly do miss the thousandfold colors of reality, the aspects of the new, world and its impetus on our present poetry... also the problems of our era, its dizzy speed, its results and failures and new ideas. All these are left out by our young poets, who shut themselves off from these realities. BESSENYEI's Article on Dezso Szabo The study by Gyorgy BESSENYEI (the name is unknown and presumably a cover name. Ed note) raises an argument against an earlier study on Dezso Szabo by Sandor ERDEI, also published in "Kortars." BESSENYEI does not see so many elements pointing to the future in DEZSO SZABO's 0works as ERDEI seems to have done. A great impact, a great popularity do not always mean great value. Dezso Szabo's popularity is due to a generation stubling along a false track. His ringing half-truth [Page 5] BACKGROUND REPORT, No.290, not only made people realize the truth but also misguided them. Neither does BESSENYBI agree with the statement by ERDEI that Dezso Szabo's race theory is unanswerable. Both Ady and Dezso Szabo became disappointed in the liberal illusions of the forty-eights. Ady took a turn for radicalism whereas Dezso Szabo does not advance but retracts... The withdrawal to earlier periods caused by disillusion over the ideals of the last century resulted in his reverting to the former eras of feudalism and Catholicism. To solve the problems of mixed-up classes and national oppression, he accepted (i.e. formed his own special race theory,) the alien conception of capitalist democracy as a remedial recourse. Dezso Szabo would like to exchange capitalism for a collective state set up on a racial basis. He was well aware of the contradictions existing within bourgeois society. In contrast with several of his contemporaries, he did not stop at mere criticism but tried to find a solution. It is here that he reached a dead-end and arrived at the most inhuman, reactionary ideology. Although Dezso Szabo enthusiastically welcomed the victory of proletarian dictatorship, he soon turned away from it. According to BESSENYEI, his starting point and his theoretical basis were wrong. He .attributes to growing Jewish influence all the shortcomings and backwardness of the Hungary of his generation... this is the racial point of view which excludes all possibilities of a realistic evaluation of historical processes. Dezso Szabo also comes into contradiction with the "populist" writers: The efforts of populist writers to achieve realism, their Strong need for truth irreconciliably clash with his irra- [Page 6] BACKGROUND REPORT, No.290, tional, mythologic, mystical, peasant ideology. In his anti-German comments made from a racial basis, the tone sometimes surpassed the anti-German attitude of "Szep Szo" and its circle and yet, with his racial theory, he built an impenetrable wall between himself and this group also. His isolation is not the Ady-type loneliness of the revolutionary who is in advance of his time; it is that of a man struggling along on separate and wrong tracks. End.
OSA / Guide / RIP / 1956 / RFE/RL Background Reports : Subjects | Browse | Search
| © 1995-2006 Open Society Archives at Central European University |